Large or "normal"
roundabouts

Part of a large roundabout
under auto-route at Calais
(measuring the outward crossfall)

Roundabout under autoroute, Calais

We should not be building large roundabouts in the UK any more - they perform too badly...

In my seminars we look at the operation of a number of large roundabouts and the problems associated with them. I have remarked already that large roundabouts perform poorly with traffic circulating at excessive speed resulting in loss of capacity and safety problems. There comes a point when large roundabouts are simply inefficient at best and downright dangerous at worst. The giant roundabouts associated with our motorway and trunk road interchanges leave so much to be desired and many of them have failed to handle the traffic demand placed upon them without extensive installation of traffic signals to enhance the capacity usually from an overloaded slip road. We (TRL) knew of this as long ago as 1971 - no more excuses.

The French and the Americans are not falling for our mistakes on this;
our worst problem is designing the roundabout allowing excessive speed on the circulatory roadway:

  • Because the whole roundabout is too large

  • Because crossfalls encourage speed

Outward draining normal and large roundabouts

Here is a short list of sites that I know of in the UK where normal roundabouts, as opposed to small (less than 8m dia), have outward drainage.  If you know others please let me know as I want to monitor their performance.

I have now seen several, but mostly they are either very old or very recently installed.
There are many of a diameter around 6-8m but few much larger than that.
The Clock-Towers at Torquay and Exeter feature.
I have some more images and will add them soon.

A37 Dorchester northern bypass, nr Charminster, Dorset
A250 (Tesco site) Sheerness , Kent
  Sea Street, Herne Bay, Kent
A26 (north of tunnel entrance) Lewes, E Sussex
A379 The Clock Tower, Torquay Harbour (image below)
  The Clock Tower, New North Road, Exeter
A367 Bath (about 2 miles out on the Exeter Road
A31 A350 (I spotted this one evening on the way back from the seminar
at Chichester; It was too dark to take any photos.
A379 B3192 Churchstow, S Devon (image below)
   
   
   
   
General view of french roundabout
lorry negotiating french roundabout
Here are views of two roundabouts near Boulogne in northern France.  The outward draining carriageway keeps speeds noticeably slower than UK roundabouts of the equivalent diameter.  The slopes that I have measured appear to be about 1:40 but although the roundabouts are on a slope themselves the radial outfall appears to be consistent;  this means that there are no changes to the lateral G-forces as a vehicle circulates the roundabout. But the roundabout MUST be circular - no elipses or other shapes.
This roundabout lies on a gentle slope and has not been profiled other than to follow that slope. It is at a rural location and the lighting unit on the centre is the only street light in the area. This is a classic "pillar of cloud by day and pillar of fire by night" example of the use of street lights on the central island. Excellent! Several clock-towers seem to have ended up on roundabouts; this one by Torquay harbour operates very well. Large pedestrian flows are accommodated at a split Pelican crossing through the splitter island just off the right of the picture.

 An accident study in France indicates that outward sloping circulation is much safer.
The table below illustrates the risk of various accident types at sites which slope either way.

Relative safety of inward/outward circulating carriageways (France)

Circulating carriageway slope

Inward sloping Outward sloping
Accident type 42 roundabouts 21 roundabouts
Total accidents per roundabout year

0.50

0.28

Accidents due to loss of control at entry

0.12

0.06

Accidents due to loss of control on circulation

0.09

0.00

Accidents due to failure to give-way/yield

0.14

0.09

Note the total absence apparently of loss of control in circulation - in the UK we are very worried about this regarding HGVs (trucks) and in icy weather. There is no information on nose-to-tail accidents (shunts) on entry - a serious problem at some large UK roundabouts that I have studied.
I think we need to learn more from the French here and I regularly visit some of their sites in northern France. Here all new roundabouts are drained away from the central island. This has a significant effect upon circulating speeds and according to a safety study reduces accidents too. But they are making one mistake that is causing some problems and that is their adherence to single lane entry. I have been advocating two lane entries at mini-roundabouts for some years for safety reasons let alone to handle traffic demand. My trip during a busy period in August 1999 highlighted this problem. Several roundabouts in key areas on the network had very long queues (over 1km) because of single lane entry. I have studied some of the A40 grade separated roundabouts in West London. A particular problem there seemed to be large numbers of nose to tail shunt accidents. As many as 50 accidents in a three year period at each site involved mainly shunts with a few entry/circulating accidents. The approach configurations seemed to be designed to encourage high speed right up to the give-way line with super-elevated curves on the approaches which were often single wide (4m) lanes before the approach flare. We seem to have missed out badly on medium sized roundabouts, where there is plenty of room to achieve high capacity but where the layout still imposes sufficient deflection to prevent excessive speeds in circulation. Probably one of the best in this category is the A26/A275 roundabout in Lewes, East Sussex, a three arm roundabout where the circulatory roadway has been drained outwards ensuring that the central island remains high and visible. It also includes a nice piece of environmental art. See below:

A26/A275 roundabout - Lewes, East Sussex

"The Scalping" A26/A275 Lewes, East Sussex
"The Scalping" A26/A275 Lewes, East Sussex
Note the outward fall on the circulatory roadway,
the conspicuous central island and the environmental art.
Note the three lane high capacity entries
and the absence of any crowns.
By sloping the circulatory roadway outwards drivers should be able to visually separate the dome of the roundabout central island from the remainder of the vista including in particular from the splitter island/central reservation.
The question of draining the circulatory roadway gets much discussion in my seminars; obviously a main worry is that of trucks overturning on roundabouts, but also that of skidding in adverse weather, including possible problems for powered two wheelers. But the truth is that drivers and riders are very aware of the side-force demands that they are making between the vehicle and carriageway and drive accordingly; problems start to arise when the carriageway suddenly changes from one slope to another, sometimes causing a considerable lurch; similar problems arise if there is an insecure load which moves suddenly as a result of or also causing a lurch. As always it is important to secure good entry deflection to ensure that drivers cannot arrive at the adverse crossfall section at excessive speed.
The advantages which are apparent to designers who accept the principle of outward drainage are considerable, not only in design, construction and maintenance, but for road safety and capacity too.

Links to other pages:

© Penntraff - March 2008
Pages designed by: