| Vertical
deflections - Construction Construction
This is certainly
an area where vertical deflections have fallen into
disrepute. It is the intention that vehicles should be
subject to a steady vertical acceleration and that the
acceleration will increase in proportion to the square of
the speed. This should therefore ensure a relatively
sharp comfort cut-off point, so for any given vertical
deflection or, more precisely, change of vertical angle
it will be relatively predictable what the maximum
comfortable speed over the feature will be. Unfortunately
the smooth profile needed onto the hump is usually
disrupted by the installation of a kerb with the
intention of holding the speed table together. There is
usually a rise of a few mm just to get onto the kerb and
if the horizontal profile of the road is poor in the
first place, a kerb placed across the road will be bound
to fail to meet the existing surface uniformly. So it is
important to get the construction right. The graphs above
indicate the actual profiles of various ramps on blacktop
speed tables that I measured shortly after construction.
All were supposed to be 75mm high with a slope that
matches the purple one to the left. In most cases the
slope was accurate at the upper part but too steep
towards the base resulting in some tyre impacts. Most of
the "offending" ramps were corrected.
The poor
ramps at Borehamwood where vehicles "drop" some
40-50mm onto the main carriageway then level over a short
distance illustrate the problem well. Large vehicles
bounce and can be noisy. By contrast the join between
carriageway and on-ramp in Duke St, Tavistock where the
carriageway has been saw-cut to allow a near perfect
join. [images to follow]
They are
particularly well constructed and bedded in to the
carriageway surface so that there is no significant
impact as at so many speed tables; but faster vehicles
would still have some slight impact as there is virtually
zero vertical radius at the beginning of the up-slope.
| This is an example of a speed
cushion constructed in a residential road. To
ensure that drivers cannot go around the cushion
the kerblines have been built out. A drainage
system has to be provided - in this case bypass
channels have been included; these require
regular maintenance. Speed
cushions have maintenance problems over the
longer term. The constant running of vehicles
over their edges often results in plastic
deformation of those built in flexible materials
and can cause some breaking up of those built in
brick or concrete.
|
 |
Single
speed cushion in pinch-point
on narrow residential road.
This is a particularly quiet residential
road
but the pinch point requires gullies or
drainage bypasses
|
|
Summary
of vertical deflections
There is
no doubt that vertical deflections work. They are almost too
effective and so are mostly used in residential areas
only. Shopping centres where buses operate and flows are
high rarely use vertical deflections, or where they do
there is usually a compromise somewhere. In both
Borehamwood and Tavistock the vertical deflections are
significantly too gentle to reduce speeds of light
vehicles sufficiently because of the problems with buses
and HGVs. The use of differential slope humps such as H-
or S- humps would be helpful.
But if you
are determined that vertical deflections are not for your
road then let's look briefly at horizontal or lateral deflections.
|